2013 Essay | The Next Generation: What’s New Under the Sun?

2013 Essay | The Next Generation: What’s New Under the Sun?

Watershed Center for the Ceramic Arts The Futures special exhibit at SOFA CHICAGO.

Hayne Bayless



 
 

Stephanie Rozene
The Corrosive Use of Money, 2012
ceramic
8 x 3 feet

I was puzzled when I saw the list of 16 names due to present at Arrowmont’s Utilitarian Clay conference last year. In the past, the names were so familiar they conjured immediate mental images of iconic pieces. This time I recognized only a handful. “Who are these people?” I wondered. “Why go?”

Then it struck me. I should go, precisely because it is these younger makers, and many others of their generation, who are what the world of clay is becoming.

Our SOFA CHICAGO 2013 special exhibit, The Futures, focuses on the work of eight past residents of Watershed Center for the Ceramic Arts. All are artists in the process of responding to challenges in the material and the making, as well as the influence of technology, a digitally connected community, and the changing face of the marketplace. They represent both the consistency of tradition and the voice of tomorrow — at once iconic and innovative.

Striving for excellence, celebrating and challenging tradition, finding one’s own voice, taking risks and working beyond failure – these are all inherent in the making process. Watershed, as a residency program committed to providing artists time and space to work in clay, witnesses this process during each two-week residency. The residents create a community that builds on shared experience and interests, yet still allows for diversity and individual perspective.

In bringing together this particular group of artists for this special exhibit – Sam Chung, Molly Hatch, Bryan Hopkins, Dan Molyneux, Jill Oberman, Stephanie Rozene, Shawn Spangler, and Arnie Zimmerman – Watershed is, in a sense, creating a new community in which we all have a place. The underlying thoughts of the makers, responding to current art and life issues each in their own way, brings us into the conversation: one that will resonate differently within each of us.

Bryan Hopkins
Vase, 2013
porcelain

 
Craft, Art and Design in the Digital Age
Stephanie Rozene believes the increased speed by which culture is created and passed on has made a difference. “We see and learn so quickly with the digital age and rise of social media that the work being created comes from and for a different place,” she says. “We stand at a crossroad where nationalities and localities intersect. It is because of this global cultural environment that identities and boundaries converge. I also think that we are making work at a time when work for the sake of form may not be enough, in that there has been such a shift culturally about the idea of commodity, that the value of the handmade has gone out the door with the over industrialization of goods.”

Rozene says she began by trying to respond to the work her teachers – Walter Ostrom, John Gill, and Linda Sikora, among others – were making. “At a certain point, I needed to start asking my own questions and find a place within the critical discourse of craft, art and design.” She feels her work now combines those principles “in an attempt to re-teach my audience about the power of ornament as a visual language, which I feel has been lost over the last century.”

Techno-clay
The effects of technology on culture have also been on Sam Chung’s mind. “It seems to me that the greatest change from the preceding generation is the influence of technology on our experience as makers,” Chung says. “This can range from having an online presence through individual or gallery websites, the ability to do business more easily but not necessarily more efficiently, the ability to digitally generate ceramic decals, and the use of 3-D modeling and CNC [computer numerical control] milling to create objects. I’m not sure if these things have developed into a clearly defined, overarching aesthetic for this generation, but the field of design has had an impact not only on my work, but on that of many other artists, mostly younger generation makers but some ‘old guard’ makers as well.”

Shawn Spangler is of a similar mind. “Ceramic is tied to ideas of culture, technology, art,” he says. “Our means of producing functional vessels is evolving. Technological development has always defined a boundary, of old and new, what is considered traditional methods and the introduction of new tools. Ceramic vessels have served as cultural indicators throughout time. We bestow these objects with the power to narrate our experience. They may guide us through stories of our past, remaining as cultural signifiers to help us locate where we once were and where we are going.”


 
 

Dan Molyneux
Punition, 2013
ceramic

Others reject notions of old and new, preferring instead the idea of a continuum. Bryan Hopkins feels that while he may have different concerns than previous generations of makers, “we are all doing relatively the same activity, and finding a need to express ourselves visually in clay. I am a process junkie, and the processes I employ are part of the content and context of my work, and relate to a ceramic history more than design or art history.”

With a downbeat assessment on the new economics of being an artist, Hopkins says selling work is now more of a concern than ever. “The only generational shift I see is a need on the part of my generation to develop new ways to market our work,” he says. “Retail craft shows are boring and expensive. Brick-and-mortar gallery shows are fewer due to the success of online only shows, as the public is willing to buy without touching – something I have never done.”

Hopkins points to the rise of studio tours such as the St. Croix Valley Pottery Tour in Minnesota and the Art of the Pot in Austin, Texas, as ways artists can “lower our overhead, increase public awareness, generate sales, and create a greater sense of community.”

Molly Hatch
Dresden I, 2013
installation

 
Has anything really changed?
Arnie Zimmerman, for one, sees generational differences as insignificant given the long view of art history. “As far as pottery and sculpture are concerned, the last 30 years have not, in my opinion, produced any sort of paradigm shift when compared to the staggering amount of human activity with clay starting way back 6000-7000 BC. Makers have been telling stories with clay from day one. So what has really changed?”

Zimmerman echoes Hopkin’s concern about the increased financial struggle makers now face. “It is harder economically now to be an artist who works with clay than when I got out of school. It’s always hard to be an artist no matter what generation or time one lives in.”

If there is a technological aspect to it, Zimmerman sees it as a double-edged sword. “The use of the computer coupled with 3-D ceramic printers will change our lives for better and worse. Better – precise production of ceramic bone for reconstructive surgery. Worse – a huge increase of ‘dead on arrival’ sculpture and objects cluttering up our daily lives.”

Dan Molyneux feels his artistic roots go back more than one generation. “I have more in common with the early ‘old guard’ — the artists of the 40s and 50s — artists who came from diverse backgrounds, careers, wartime experiences and were harbored by new avenues in education.”

Molyneux considers that period more encouraging to a broader spectrum of makers. “[It was] a more modern academy that was inclusive of many walks of life regardless of gender, social status, and bolstered by the introduction of the GI bill. These artists and craftspeople brought a lot of real life experience to the table. I believe the academy only strengthened the experience of our artists until a point came, after many decades, where formal education just may have become a crutch to the new generation. Any artist who can translate genuine experience into their work strikes me as a modern, relevant artist.”

As a designer as well as a maker, Molly Hatch is part of the forefront of clay artists who aren't just content just to stay in the studio and make pots. I have found my career is in a pattern of crossing over and back again between the worlds of academia, art, craft and design,” she says. “Being open to the opportunity to shift my career focus from studio pottery to licensing my studio pots to industry for manufacture and effectively becoming an artist-designer has allowed me to develop a career that is somewhat indefinable. I wonder if it’s because of this generational shift? Is it how my generation shops? I believe we spend money on the things we value – is my generation valuing my design/manufactured work over my pots?”



 
 

Jill Oberman
The Pull of Memory, 2012
porcelain

Residencies: Creating Community and Looking
to the Future
As academic institutions continue to scale back craft programs, or eliminate them entirely, it is critically important that residency organizations like Watershed continue to serve as catalysts for the development of young ceramic artists, such as the eight represented here in The Futures.

I had my first Watershed experience in 2002 as part of a session organized by Woody Hughes. I already knew several of my fellow invitees, some I‘d only heard of, and others I got to know very quickly. Whatever we did in our artistic careers and whatever divisions or distinctions we arrived with at once melted away and we became peers; Watershed was a hierarchy-free zone. It turned out to be one of the most profound, rewarding, and transformative experiences of my life. I work alone in my studio, by choice, but sometimes the insularity can get in the way of creating. Working all day, every day, with other potters and clay artists opens things up, blows the dust out, and puts your head back on a little straighter.

Regardless of the differences in the intent and form of the artists in this exhibition, they all share a common tie. They have all spent time at Watershed, away from the demands of daily life. Whether they came at the beginning of their career or took a break at some more recent stage, whether they met at Watershed or not, they have all contributed to an experience that we can all share. We are honored that they chose to share their work and their thoughts. We look forward to what comes next.

***

Hayne Bayless is a potter living and working in Connecticut. He is a past resident of Watershed Center for Ceramic Arts and currently serves on the Board of Advisors. He exhibits extensively across the United States as a maker and leads numerous hand-building workshops at clay centers and guilds.

Published in conjunction with The Futures special exhibit at SOFA CHICAGO 2013 presented by Watershed Center for the Ceramic Arts.

Participating artists include: 
Sam Chung is an associate professor of ceramics at the Herberger Institute for Design and the Arts at Arizona State University in Tempe.
Molly Hatch is a potter and designer in Florence, MA, and teaches at the Rhode Island School of Design and Holyoke Community College.
Bryan Hopkins is an adjunct professor of ceramics and three-dimensional design at Niagara County Community College in Sanborn, NY.
Dan Molyneux is a ceramic artist with recent residencies at Mudflat Studios in Somerville, MA and Maison des Metiers d‘Art in Quebec City.
Jill Oberman is the Executive Director of the Carbondale Clay Center in Carbondale, CO.
Stephanie Rozene is an assistant professor of art and head of the ceramics studio at the Anderson Center for the Arts at Hartwick College in Oneonta, NY.
Shawn Spangler is an assistant professor at the University of Hawaii, Manoa.
Arnie Zimmerman is an artist in Brooklyn, NY.

Copyright © Sculpture Objects Functional Art and Design 2017. All Rights Reserved.
Produced by Urban Expositions, a Clarion Events Company | Privacy